> Let's face it, Solaris was a pile of crap. Security-wise alone, it was a disaster.

Huh, that wasn't my impression at all - for a long while wasn't it much safer to have unprivileged untrusted users on Solaris than on Linux? (that is, Linux quite frequently had local privilege escalations, I thought Solaris didn't?)

I guess "security" is a broad term, what sort of security?