Lean Voyeurism: 8 guys hacking a Startup in 3 Weeks leave Kimono wide open
3weekstolive.wordpress.com
3weekstolive.wordpress.com
Plus saying, "they suck and we won't" isn't the most convincing argument to sign up.
As for "they suck and we won't", I'm afraid our pitch there isn't even that good. More like, "they suck and we might not." All about testing hypotheses and seeing if we can solve the problem better (and make money doing it).
It was creepy.
Language aside, I like the business idea.
http://buyersvote.com/categories/the-best-email-newsletter-c...
My biggest challenge: critical mass.
My hope was that with some seeded pages it would start to rank for long tail keywords, and it would grow organically from there. This largely hasn't happened unfortunately.
I think starting in one niche (ala Facebook), or being prepared to slog through several years of negative cash flow and paid reviews to gain traction (TripAdvisor), or having a giant blog following (StackOverflow) could be what's needed to get critical mass solved.
Your use of "hacking" is confusing and possibly incorrect. AFAIK when "hack" is transitive it usually means violating, exploiting, or modifying an existing system, which it doesn't sound like you have yet.
"hacking together a startup" would probably be more clear, meaning that you're making it quickly out of technology without regard to elegance (for now).
"hacking on a startup" might be best, meaning that you're playfully modifying or exploiting (but not violating) the startup, but it still semi-implies that it's a pre-existing system. This also doesn't work with "in 3 weeks", so you'd have to change it to "for 3 weeks" or maybe say "hacking on a 3-week startup".
While I'm at it, the "leave kimono wide open" thing isn't really clear. It sounds like "some guys put together their startup too carelessly and got pwned."