See this super interesting twitter thread:
https://twitter.com/investing_city/status/117997425777998233...
See this super interesting twitter thread:
https://twitter.com/investing_city/status/117997425777998233...
Membership fees also aren’t pure profit - there’s some overhead with them and other member services at a net negative that lower it below 100%.
It's on Twitter, what did you expect.
The backing analysis for this claim has none of Costco’s costs associated with membership, such that membership fees were pure profit. Yes, it's membership fees acocunt for revenue that is more than 100% of it's profit. It's merchandise sales account for revenue that is more than 100% of it's profit by a vastly wider margin, though.
The actual share of profits due to membership fees is a much more complicated question, but it's certainly not the full amount that treating it's membership fees as pure profit would suggest.
Anyone mind explaining how more than 100% is possible?
People get the Costco membership but barely go to it because Walmart or Kroger is closer.
Plus some companies buy loads of Costco membership for employee benefit.
Furthermore, they offer a full guarantee. Don't like it and they will refund you.
How about I rephrase: "I felt lied to and taken advantage of, and I decided not to bother being a customer any longer, given that I shopped there very infrequently and despise high pressure sales tactics."
In the end, this is about my personal customer experience, which I've subjectively decided sucked enough to outweigh the utility I got from Costco membership. I can't stand pushy salespeople, and I basically argued with the cashier for several minutes telling him that I didn't want to upgrade. I said no at least five or six times.
I should have just stuck to my position, but after I was told that there was literally no way to lose money even if I never took any action to get a refund, I caved because I wanted to go home.