Most first-time visitors to Japan are struck by how clean the country is
bbc.com
bbc.com
At some point though, I was cycling along the coast of Mie then Wakayama prefectures, and although the scenery and roads were clean, I had a glance just behind the ramp walk, and realized that behind the trees, in the bush next to the road were hundreds of garbage bags, litter of all sort, really anything, just lying below. There was such a contrast from what my eyes were seeing until, I was shocked.
In another town several kilometres after (I forgot which place exactly, must have been while cycling up towards Wakayama city), I passed next to a big commercial area on my right. On my left there was a small patch of forest then the sea and again, that forest contained many many plastic bags, full but neatly tied up, every couple of meters or so, for several hundreds of meters.
I originally thought the first thrashes I saw along the road in the country side where "mistakes", like things flying off the window or pushed by the wind from another place (although there was a lot of garbage anyway). But when I saw these tied up plastic bags, they weren't there by chance, really people throw these bags away on the forest right here. That made me a bit sad, especially since it broke the original image I got.
(And I haven't spoke about the beaches and seafront all along that peninsula; I wouldn't walk bare foot there).
Then I came home in Switzerland, looked up the small water stream close to my place, and realized it wasn't as neat as one can see at first glance... So I should probably start with that before criticising other countries sigh
I did the short Shimanami Kaido over the inland sea which was, of course, wonderful.
[1] https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nuRT79jhVqLFPncCh9PnUhxK6K...
Even compared to Americans, we are terrible litterers. You can see this in people’s behaviours in fast food restaurants: in the US (as in many other countries), customers will bin their food wrappers and return their tray when they leave. Even groups of kids will typically do this: it’s just habit. In the UK, typical customers will just leave their mess at the table when they leave. Cleaning is someone else’s job.
I’ll bite. Why?
Though as the article notes, Japan similarly has few rubbish bins.
Not in a fast-food restaurant, no.
You'll often see folks in cafés help out and return their trays, but it's not a guarantee - and in some establishments it's not even possible for you as a customer to do this. At the end of the day, you're paying to sit down - and clearing your table afterwards is priced into the food offer.
Fast food is a bit more of a grey area, since there's not necessarily table service. I'd throw away my rubbish at e.g. Burger King - there's usually bins provided for this purpose.
I don't think it's really all that outrageous to just leave the detritus on the table in either case. But when there's no table service, the tables won't be getting cleared so regularly, so it can make things inconvenient for the other patrons.
I would clean up after myself somewhere like McDonalds or Burger King, though in a cafe or restaurant I wouldn't. In a restaurant I usually put the plates together to make it easier for the waiter or waitress to clear the table and try not to be too messy.
Well... yeah if you're eating in a restaurant, then yes it literally is someone else's paid job to clean your table. That's what makes it a restaurant.
Do you also criticise people who go to a restaurant and expect someone else to cook their food?
Or people who get a taxi and then expect someone else to drive?
That is: there isn’t staff enough to handle it, and those that leave their tray just ensure that prices go up (since they are using a service they didn’t pay for).
I have never left a tray in a fast food restaurant in 40 years.
One morning in Tokyo, I saw construction workers starting to dig up a street. It was a large operation, they were exposing some massive pipes, and there were a few policemen, politely pointing pedestrians to a way around the site.
In the evening I went the same way again, to see how far they had gotten with the digging. However, there was no hole anymore. They were already done, and the street looked like new, with hardly a trace of what had happened.
I felt kinda bad about my place (Germany), where this would have taken at least a week.
It's more a function of the size of the city, at least in rich countries with a functioning public service.
I wish we could invent some super-efficient equipment that makes road-building/construction 10x faster...
A) just an inspection B) regulated to the same degree as in Germany (i.e. digging a hole and covering it up is easy if don't have rules) C) succesful D) done properly
I was in Osaka this weekend and litter is everywhere. By far one of the dirtiest major cities I’ve seen in East Asia. In the city I live in in Japan, the rice fields are full of coffee cans, plastic bottles, and bento packaging thrown out from cars. Streets are covered in cigarette butts and somehow I see natto containers in the middle of nowhere. Going hiking, I see tea bottles and plastic bags from convenience stores all over the damn place.
Most parts of Tokyo and cities with tourism are generally clean because there are heavy cleanup operations. People are still littering just like everywhere else.
> Invisible dirt – germs and bacteria – are another source of concern. When people catch colds or flu, they wear surgical masks to avoid infecting other people.
But you’ll never catch people washing their hands and grandpas always pull down their mask to cough so as to not dirty it. I caught a news program during flu season last year telling people how to avoid the flu. Their recommendations? Keep your stomach wrapped and extra warm, and drink green tea since it cures influenza.
But the touristy area of Osaka was back to being dreadful. People cutting you off while walking, groups stopping in the middle of the way, often with their rolling suitcases blocking more of the path. I noticed there were many Chinese tourists (from the language with which they were shouting at each other..).
I don't agree that the lack of litter is only due to the cleanup. The Japanese in general follow the rules as expected, like I wrote above with queueing and putting their phones on silent mode.
Yet Japan is a very noisy country. Store clerks shouting irasshaimase like robots, speaking elevators, politians in campaign and their cars with mega-phone, etc. added to paper thin (sometimes literally) walls make it sometime painful to live here.
You need to choose your place not to pick a cheap rent with paper thin walls...
That could be as simple as broken windows theory but the contrast with Brooklyn is striking.
The cultural attitude difference is real to some degree. People tend to smoke while standing in one place, a designated smoking area outside with an ashtray, not walk and smoke. This is a huge difference and reflects a priority on not annoying people around you.
That’s just one of many example I could give of what are obviously and viscerally differences in habit, custom, and perspective about consideration for strangers.
You just don't have any trash to drop, you'd keep it in your bag if you did, and there's bins at konbini or vending machines everywhere.
Today, like most days, on the news they had more videos of Rugby tourists passed out on the street, replaying the subway video, etc. This time they had a segment about gaijin putting out cigarette butts with their shoes and walking off for like 5 minutes.
Haven't seen it any worse than the Rugby World Cup.. I don't want to be around for the Olympics.
Many were removed as a security measure after the 1995 sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway.
Hiking.. have you actually hiked anywhere in else in the world? Most places you can fill a garbage bag in an hour just walking on a trail. Took my climbing friends from Canada on a long Hike in Kita Alps, they brought a garbage bag as they always do to gather other peoples trash. We managed to find 2 empty water bottles in 3 days having covered close to 50km. See the campsites near huts after people leave in the morning they are EMPTY.
Try camping at a car camp sites.. now compare that to the clusterfuck of drunks, blaring music, trash, puke piss, shit that you get in NA. Went to Ishikawa for a week this summer camped by the sea, huge camp site tons of people actually very nice. Same thing in US? God fucking help you. This is why they actually don’t have assigned lots for tents, in Canada people would get killed every long weekend if anyone was dumb to try that(car camping)
Of course there is garbage in cities in some places but compared to vast majority of the world it is clean. They actually clean public toilets.. it is a miracle.
There are a couple of places where people have left shotgun shells that I can think of around some of the 4 wheeling areas around Phoenix, but it’s nowhere near any sort of hiking trail.
Japan's Alps really are quite something. Leaving the area cleaner than you found it is taken quite seriously by Japanese hikers.
I've hiked in the Southern Alps, including up Kitadake, Japan's second highest mountain, during my stay there as a graduate student. The occasional views you get of Mount Fuji standing far out in the plains are breathtaking! I joined a hiking group at the university I was staying at, which proofed a rewarding way to get to know Japan's hiking culture.
To be fair though, as soon as you leave the family-friendly day-trip hiking trails leading from the valleys to mountain hotels/restaurants well below the treeline in Europe's Alps behind and get to the trails that require at least a minimal amount of preparation and gear the story is much the same. People clean up after themselves, and pick the incidental wrapper or bottle lost by others along the way. People who hike up a mountain are on the whole a lot more respectful of nature and personal responsibility.
British towns and cities aren't great, embarrassingly bad compared to the Japanese cities I've been to.
I spent a weekend in Lisbon recently and was fairly shocked at how bad the litter / rubbish was. The worst I've seen in Europe. Warm climate made it smelly too.
While I generally agree, the funny part about this is that it’s not uncommon in Japan for people to refer to people from Osaka as being “not Japanese.”
They also completely disown their litter. It’s always foreigners, even if it’s natto boxes.
As an American, I’ve always felt more comfortable there because it’s way less uptight and rule-bound than other parts of Japan.
While we're on the subject of Osaka stories, about 5 years ago in February I was walking with friends near the "Running Man" bridge in Shinsaibashi. Probably around 1am, and cold. A taxi pulls up close to the bridge....the driver pops the trunk, a passenger joins him at the rear of the vehicle....and they took a PASSED OUT Japanese dude outta the taxi's trunk and just laid him on the concrete. He didn't even have a shirt on. They reached in the trunk and threw a shoe at him. Then the taxi left. We're just standing there in awe thinking "No shirt, shoes off, probably drunk and lying on cold concrete in February? That dude is gonna die of hypothermia and whoever dropped him off doesn't seem to give 2 shits....man Osaka is wild."
Not surprising as this is about 2 blocks from the parking lot where all the yakuza park their exotics[1]. Look at that building in Street View and even in daytime there's a yellow exotic parked there.
Still very Japanese IMHO, it certainly has its own vibe.. The craft beer and brewpub scene is great, and people generally seem more friendly and open to strangers and foreigners. Cycling culture seems stronger. An outsiders observation; people are much more likely to cross a crosswalk early or otherwise outside the proper time in Osaka!
Hanami is also spectacular in Osaka and Kyoto.
People don't throw when it's clean, like how the NY subway changed.
I've never seen people pull down mask to cough in the middle of others.
You sound like running a negative campaign.
15 years ago, it wasn't like this. As recently as 8 years ago you started seeing people exhibiting blatantly antisocial behavior in public, littering, not giving way in the roads, noisy devices, etc. When they open their mouths you realize they are not Japanese. The frequency of such encounters has increased steadily with time.
I was in the area last year and was shocked at how bad it's gotten. Rokko-san, trashed. Garbage bags ripped open and left to lay on the streets of Osaka. It's unbearably sad to see this happening.
Glad to see someone finally repeating what I have been saying forever about Japan. It's clean because there is an army of people cleaning the place every single day. Multiple times a day.
Compared to most major global cities it's night and day.
I'd take a hard look on NY, Chicago, L.A, London, Paris, Amsterdam, before I complain like the grandparent about the Japanese situation which is an order of magnitude better...
Tokyo of course is on a league of its own, but here's Osaka Street View, go around, how does it compare to what you read?
https://www.google.com/maps/@34.675107,135.5261238,3a,75y,27...
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.6960715,139.7029924,3a,75y,2...
We can compare that to a random spot in skid row, LA.
https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0413292,-118.2437281,3a,75y,...
https://www.google.com/maps/@34.6687543,135.5013888,2a,75y,3...
(Now let's compare with the sorry state a lot of European cities are in)
At night time I did see quite a bit of beer cans/bottles around, however, either people or cleanup crews seemed to group them together to make cleanup easier.
If this is due to cleanup operations, I feel other cities around the world should consider such logistics because it makes travel there one of the most pleasant experiences I've had.
It'd be an interesting way to test/refute the obvious hypothesis that the article is promoting. If the answer is yes, then the hypothesis can, more or less, be rejected.
Compared to which other cities? Bangkok, Manila, Hanoi, and Ho Chi Minh City all make even the dirty parts of Japan look like a surgical suite. Seoul, Taipei, and Hong Kong are kinda okay, roughly equivalent to Tokyo when it's a little dirty.
I was in Osaka earlier in the week, and Kyoto after that. And these cities were also quite clean and orderly, with Osaka being the most orderly (and much more relaxed and slow paced, which makes order easier).
One of my favorite parts of Japan's cleanliness is their cars. They are all sparkling. Even the delivery trucks are shiny and splatter free! The gas/petrol station near me had at least two attendeds at each car, one to pump, and the other to clean the car's windows and paint!
Another fascinating thing is how escalators have two lanes, one for walking and one for standing. Why doesn't everyone so this?! It's so perfect!
Others in this thread don't speak too highly of Osaka, but it was definitely the most orderly and trash free of the three cities I've visited. Of course, these cities are quite huge, compared to cities in the US, so perhaps these conversations should be more fine grained, generalizing by prefecture rather than city.
I've found that I've been lining my things up neatly, and organizing my clothes and toiletries here in my in my hotel. It's been inspiring to see all the order here.
I wish they'd just draw lines on escalators in Germany already. Keeping the left side of the escalator free and standing on the right is an unwritten rule here, but about one in twenty stand on the left anyways (tourists? people lost in thought?).
In the morning I often want to catch a connecting train that departs only about minute later, and pretty much every time I have to ask one or two people to step aside so I can pass. The fastest way to reach the other platform happens to be by means of two escalators. Other people who have been to Berlin Friedrichstraße station probably know which escalators I'm talking about.
The fastest way I have found of getting people to step aside is startling them with a firm "SORRY!" - works on tourists as well as Germans.
When I see more than three people on the left side I usually just give up though. By the time they'll have sorted themselves out the train will probably be gone anyways and I don't fancy breaking into a sprint just to make up for the lost seconds. I'd rather suck it up and wait a few minutes for the next train while getting a coffee on the platform.
I guess what I'm saying is that something as simple as two lines on escalators can make a difference of ten minutes or more in the commute of some people.
Turns out, strangely, that it actually reduces throughput compared to just having everyone stand. So not exactly perfect I guess.
But yea I agree in the general matter. When my MIL (a master organizer) visited Japan she thought that was great.
Wait, what? How can this be true?
Imagine an escalator w/ both lanes filled with people just standing. Now imagine the left lane starts walking: clearly, higher throughput.
Now, maybe you're imagining a scenario where people don't want to walk. Now everyone stands on the right, and the left lane is completely empty. OK, now we've reduced throughput by half compared to "everyone standing".
So as we consider moving between the extremes of "no walkers" and "walker saturation", there will be some break-even point of throughput. And beyond that having a walking lane will be more efficient.
(Also, besides raw throughput, having a walking lane gives you a better "fastest possible traversal time", which is also valuable, for people in a hurry.)
The issue with the "everyone starts walking" is the same reason why stationary cars are closer together than moving cars. If people walked with military trained precision you could get the same density and vastly higher throughput by walking. But for civilian strangers, it turns out two lanes of standing gives high enough density to trump the increased speed of walking, in terms of total throughput. I'm fairly certain there's even a study showing this. They tested it in london underground at least.
But yes, it's certainly better for the few walkers.
Taking a look at the study you mention (linked in other comments), it seems like the escalators they studied were well to the "too few people want to walk" side of the curve to be efficient.
I wonder how close the break-even point is to the simple metric, "do you have to wait to enter on the right?"
Or thinking of the queue length for standers, clearly when the length is 0 allowing walking is more efficient (you've taken nothing away from the standers, and the walkers are more efficient). But there is some point where the stand-queue length, let's call it N, is big enough that the corresonding wait-time means overall throughput is lowered by allowing walking.
I think it would be quite reasonable to require standing in those situations.
So the rule could be something like, "stand on the right, walk on the left, unless there is a queue of more than N people waiting to stand on the right, in which case you may stand on the left." Easy right? ;-)
(I wonder if N would vary w/ escalator length? Intuitively, almost certainly. So we'd have to post signs next to each escalator w/ its individual stand-queue limit. :-)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/it-is-faster-to-s...
> Standing-only escalators had a "throughput" of up to 151 passengers per minute, while an escalator where commuters were still allowed to walk saw around 115.
Your thought experiment's completely right, but in real world circumstances, once an escalator is above a certain height, people rarely use the walking lane:
> But a 2002 study of escalator capacity on the Underground found that on machines such as those at Holborn, with a vertical height of 24 metres, only 40% would even contemplate it [walking up]. By encouraging their preference, TfL effectively halves the capacity of the escalator in question, and creates significantly more crowding below, slowing everyone down.
(from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jan/16/the-tube-at-... , which has a great graphic showing the two systems)
It's a long escalator, so few people walk (40% according to the Guardian article). And then during rush hour there's a crowd in front of the escalator.
This blog post estimates walking is 26 seconds and standing is 40 seconds: https://www.capgemini.com/gb-en/2016/04/would-standing-on-th...
The optimal policy is to have everyone walk 2 abreast as densely as possible, so this about debating two suboptimal policies. Presumably if it was actually a problem they would just build another escalator.
The problem is that people who want to walk are limited in reality by how quickly the slowest person ahead of them is traveling as well as conventions that make it unlikely that people would get within 1 full step of the person in front of them, reducing the lane's volume to 1/3 (the step you're on plus the step you're taking + space) of the possible occupancy of the standing lane.
So I could definitely see that assertion being true.
Agreed that this is an imagined scenario because people in a hurry will want to maximize their speed by walking/running up the escalator.
More importantly, people generally (I'm imagining) do not want to stand on the same escalator step as another person, especially if they are strangers to each other.
That means in a 2-lane standing escalator there will be breaks between people standing to the left or the right which, effectively, will turn a 2-lane standing-only escalator into a "1-lane" standing escalator.
First random video I googled for nyc escalator shows this behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmCOjC_9Iyc
EDIT: spelling
In Korea (and AFAIK Japan too), people very care of what other people think about them. They consider the consequences of every action carefully. One of the results is that people generally don't litter in front of other people, and that makes the city clean. The places without much people, they are dirtier than others because there aren't other people around them.
Sejong is a brand new city, made in 2014, yet there was litter everywhere, especially right near bus stops. I distinctly recall seeing empty coffee cups tossed in the planters/hedges nearby.
There were almost zero trash cans so what do you expect. The bathrooms didn’t have tissue or anything either, you had to go to one of the nearby stores or cafes and get some.
Seoul has plenty of dirty areas just like any other enormous city.
People litter everywhere. Some Japanese people may be more conscious about not littering, but so are some Americans! This article reeks of orientalism.
Mostly due to people who wait at the bus stops alone; I've never seen people littering at the bus stops at the rush hour, but I've definitely seen people leaving their empty coffee cups on the benches when (they think) nobody's looking.
> There were almost zero trash cans so what do you expect.
That's mostly because of the stupid decision of that trash cans 'look' dirty, which causes the broken window effect... but IMO that was a stupid decision.
> The bathrooms didn’t have tissue or anything either, you had to go to one of the nearby stores or cafes and get some.
Hmm, that's not what I experienced, I've rarely seen public bathrooms without any tissue.
I believe that is what Shintoism teaches.
As much as that surprised me, it also kind of didn't because there are people working everywhere on everything all the time. The number of concrete mixers driving around was amazing. Infrastructure is never finished and always seems to be well funded. I feel kind of embarrassed when I see Japanese people visiting my city, like they've come to some kind of pioneer town with our litter everywhere, far too many cars for the available roads and with our laughably inadequate public transit infrastructure.
I would say the big difference is that in Australia (or least Brisbane where I was) laws against littering are actually enforced. And public drinking is a lot more regulated.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinstitutionalisation
and as a result, they have four times the rate of involuntarily locking people up for mental illness as the average:
> For the last 40 years mental health care has shifted from hospital-based settings to community-based ones in most countries. As a result the number of psychiatric care beds has fallen considerably internationally (Glasby & Tew, 2015:106). More and more people with mental disorders are living and being cared for in the community. In contrast, Japan still has a very high ratio of psychiatric care beds per capita among member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), with 269 beds per 100,000 population compared to the average of 68 (OECD, 2014:11).
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S...
Bringing in the subject of homelessness seems tangential to the topic at hand.
The cities were noticeably cleaner than Swedish cities though, a lot fewer chewing gums and cigarette butts from what I remember.
To be clear, this isn't just a US problem, pretty much all countries that I've visited (just a sampling to be sure) are like this including other Asian countries. Japan really stands out as being different in this respect. I hope it can stay that way.
My friend concluded that much of it had to do with collectivism vs individualism. Either way I think Americans need to improve their bathroom etiquette.
It's interesting that years back there was a man with mental health issues who carried out attacks by putting chemicals in garbage cans in public places. After this Japan got rid of garbage cans in public. Most of them, at least.
You walk downtown Tokyo and there are no garbage cans and no garbage anywhere. Every once in a while you come across a small convenience store with a very small can inside or every 10 or so vending machines will have a small bin for bottles or cans. But for the most part Japan is EXTREMELY clean. The city can be old, but it's all still clean.
Go to Shibuya, the famous crossing with thousands of people. Show up there in the morning before rush hour and you'll see very few people, and the streets are all clean. No garbage anywhere.
There's your trash.
There's a good chance it was tourists as they had brought in skip bins that were all overflowing to the point where the skip was sitting in a mound of rubbish.
Seems not having bins in public places cuts down littering as there is no expectation that you can dump your rubbish and someone else will deal with it. A similar thing happened in Brisbane when they removed all the public bins for the G20. The few remaining bins were all overflowing with litter everywhere or people dumped rubbish where they used to be.
Is it to stop germs from spraying in the air or is it more a polite thing? Or maybe to avoid having to carry the soiled tissue.
Do they hide in an alley to do it?
A:Because there is a horde of foreign workers doing the cleaning up.
What'll it be this time? Communism? Authoritarianism?
Alas, this is one of the American values we have lost.
This is a mostly invisible issue for tourists since trash collection happens in the morning and people take the trash out the night before, so the piles of trash and animals are visible at night mostly.
And they then enter the convinis (warning, gross rats inside convini):
https://twitter.com/Ginkai19990324/status/115807601769873408...