Not to be a dick, but this just feels like an ad for their training product. There's no re-enaction, 'Re-Enact' is referring to their training course that they want you to buy. The meat of the article takes up 2 out of the 13 paragraphs.
Am I just being overly critical?
No, you're being cynical, which more people need to be when reading headlines and believing them.
Yours is better as a reenactement, but with what little experience I gained by following both, the one in the title is a better training tool. It lets you try and fail to advance, and you learn better by fixing your mistakes.
My favorite part of the Panama Papers leak was how only one registered agent got leaked and how this low bar was masquaraded as a big win.
Just be cheaper faster and more secure and you get many customers.