In her defense, she does claim to be ruined as a writer.

This was the one and only thought that came to mind when I made an attempt to read the article.

I do wonder if it's just a question of attention span. Does the author ramble or am I just incapable of following along on a long form article? Would I have read this article before the internet? I truly don't know, but I do know that there is literally a nearly infinite amount of material to read (relative to my time remaining in life to read it) and I can't waste time on writing such as this.

Wow. It is only semi-structured, but incoherent? Surely not. For one, I got the point of the writer, and got it well. I could feel how she feels. Sure it doesn't follow some rigid way of "how things should be written*, but I trust a monologue that looks written as if by a human, with the rhythm of a human, than any polished, structured piece.

Agree. Indeed it reads like a parody of (self-obsessed & pretentious) bad writing.

I got halfway through, and baffled by how badly written it was, figured the author was writing ironically.