On one hand, organized crime, observable in most countries where governments are present, on the other hand everyday objects and a disease.
Doesn’t look like an argument made in good faith.
On one hand, organized crime, observable in most countries where governments are present, on the other hand everyday objects and a disease.
Doesn’t look like an argument made in good faith.
The exact same mechanisms are available to fight both car deaths and malicious actors. Why do we trust the government to do one but not the other?
(Keep in mind I'm NOT in favor of backdooring crypto, I just don't think "but the government is corrupt" is a good argument against it)
Anne Frank's father had nothing to hide when he filled in the official forms asking his family religion and we all know how that turned out...
This does not benefit the population, it only benefits organized crime organizations entrenched in government.
How do cars benefit organized crime as disproportionally as abovementioned tools?