Hacker News Reader

Monica already posted everything from her side here:

https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-...

Or is there some specific piece of information you feel she is withholding?

She posted her side of the story, with no material backing information making, as I’ve said, a he-said-she-said tale. We don’t know anything material of the exchange. Yet everyone feels compelled to assume bad faith on SE’s part.

This is basically guilt determined by a closed court in which the accused has no representation and no reason is given for the judgement, and in fact even the rule they've been found guilty of isn't disclosed, even to them.

So what is it exactly that they've done to earn any benefit of the doubt?

Monica’s defence is proving a negative at this point. She claims she was removed without just cause. She has provided evidence that she was removed. However, it is difficult for her to prove there was no just cause. Maybe she could provide transcripts for her N years at stackoverflow detailing all her interactions with the community then we can be sure she was removed without good reason.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com