His one good point is that "The Singularity" is a bad name for a concept that doesn't refer to a single event, which makes it easy to dismiss with the "rapture of the nerds" strawman. Aside from that, it's mostly an argument from personal incredulity, which is even less valid here than usual. I wouldn't have believed you a year ago if you told me that a search and advertising company had self-driving cars roaming around Mountain View, but here we are.

Despite all the sensory inputs we can attach to computers these days, and vast stores of human knowledge like Wikipedia that one can feed to them, almost all such data is to a computer nearly meaningless.

IBM's Watson might disagree (http://money.cnn.com/2011/01/13/technology/ibm_jeopardy_wats...). But of course responding to natural language questions (er, answers) will be moved to the "not real AI" category once it's commonplace.