For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Singh#Chiropractic_lawsu...
That way it'll read less like a "left is mean" and more "reforming this should be a non-political, multi-partisan concern".
For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Singh#Chiropractic_lawsu...
That way it'll read less like a "left is mean" and more "reforming this should be a non-political, multi-partisan concern".
Dog whistles? What "secret meaning" is meant to be conveyed?
> This article could be construed as being right leaning
I don't see how the article can be construed as "right leaning" as there is nothing conservative or liberal about supporting free speech and the value to listening to dissenting opinions.
Indeed, I think the desire to categorize arguments, article, positions or especially people as "conservative" or "liberal" rather than engaging with ideas on their merits is a distinctly negative trend that accelerates our descent into ineffectual partisan bickering. It means that anyone who takes the time to consider issues carefully and form their own opinion gets shut out as a "liberal" by the conservative and a "conservative" by the liberals. Thus the people who we should be paying the most attention to are the ones who get ignored.