Maybe pay people more and treat them better?
But I can see the appeal of restaurant automation. Machines can work 24/7, don't need health insurance, don't fight for higher wages, don't need to be trusted around cash registers, etc.
Maybe pay people more and treat them better?
But I can see the appeal of restaurant automation. Machines can work 24/7, don't need health insurance, don't fight for higher wages, don't need to be trusted around cash registers, etc.
How very un-American of you. /s
One thing that always staggers me in endless discussion is that nobody ever, ever talks about decreasing profits as a way to fix societies problems.
I mean, in 2018 McDonald's returned $8.5 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends, it announced a 15% increase in its quarterly dividend to $1.16 per share. [1]
I bet the workers would like some of that.
[1] https://news.mcdonalds.com/news-releases/news-release-detail...
Numbers: Shares outstanding 768,000,000 Employees: 210,000 Percentage of McDonald's that are corporate owned: 20% Dividend per employee: ($1.16 * 768,000,000 * 0.2) / 210,000 ~= $850
Or, more snarkily, what have the investors done to "earn" this?
I completely agree that if you're offering a minimum wage hourly job with no benefits you don't get to complain about difficulties finding staff and retaining them. They have tons of options at that price point if they want to switch jobs. If you want to avoid having to constantly deal with turnover you need to offer more.
This is the situation in restaurants, where most purchases are not going to be willing to pay extra for food to so that the cooks can make more money, because a competing restaurant with acceptable food is almost always available at a cheaper price by not paying the staff as much.