1. They are not lifestyle changes, they are fundamental reductions in carbon footprint.

2. They are proven to reduce your impact at a level that most consider manageable

3. The other poster said AND - eat less meat AND get involved in other mechanisms for change

I dont have any interest in virtue or signalling: i just want people to impact the planet less so we dont trigger any unwanted changes. Is that a valid enough reason to ask everyone to try their best or do we keep having to have philosophical arguments about how individual free choice (shaped often by the corporations themselves!) trumps any imperative to collectively sacrifice?