Hacker News Reader

Comment by perlgeek | Hacker News Reader

Do Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky still a say in how SE is run? If yes, now would be the perfect time to step in and moderate the discussion.

View on HN

One of the moderators resigned by citing a persistent pattern of corporate missteps and a monumentally deplorable moderator dismissal.

Jeff Atwood commented under the resignation: "It is definitely hard to see long time deep contributors go, but this is sometimes the way of life. I don't begrudge anyone after ~10 years wanting a change."

https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/389906/moderator-re...

Hardly seems helpful to me in calming down the heated minds.

In the linked post Jeff Atwood is in the comments moaning about the title.

I believe it was also Jeff Atwood who, for the longest time, could not fathom why people did not like being forced to use OpenID to log into Stack Overflow. Like, he could literally not fathom it and agonized in blog posts over his own inability to understand people (he was quite honest about it). Even though they caved on this point, to this day Stack Overflow actively fights new users trying to get in and participate on the platform (I have long since given up).

Jeff seems to have a lot of trouble empathising with users, especially when they want something that clashes with whatever he has discovered is the 'right' solution. See blocklists in discourse, why people join unions, &c.

Jeff Atwood had left half a decade or more ago, to work on a forum platform, called discourse. Joel Spolsky was CEO until last month, but I don't know how much he worked directly on the Q&A.

He quit just a month or so ago. https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2019/03/28/the-next-ceo-of-st...

Atwood has not worked there since 2012 and has no say in the day-to-day operations: https://blog.codinghorror.com/what-does-stack-overflow-want-...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com