Faster Progress Bars: Manipulating Perceived Duration with Augmentations (2010) [pdf]
chrisharrison.net
chrisharrison.net
n=10
Other thought: First, I appreciated the efficiency of “5 female.” Then, I noticed that it would have been more efficient to write “5 male,” finally I realized there may come a time when ‘“5 male” doesn’t provide enough information.’
Yes interesting idea for a study but only 10 participants, presumably all around the same age.
Too bad this is what passes off as scholarship in Human-Computer Interaction nowadays. I remember seeing a paper from CHI (the top conference in the field, where OP was also published) lamenting the field's far lower standard of scholarship compared to psychology — the poster child of replication crisis!