> Would a Republican vote for a womanizing Russia-serving friend of Epstien?
If the alternative is a Democrat? You bet.
If the alternative is a Democrat? You bet.
The Democrat you're referring to never owned any Uranium to sell.
> whose husband is a womanizer and of a very good friend of Epistein no less.
A fault of association with a womanizing friend of Epstein vs. a fault of actually being a womanizing friend of Epstein's does not seem like a very strong reason. The real reason they voted for Trump is the R next to his name.
Yet millions flowed to her foundation upon the completion of that sale[0], getting paid for something you don't own is worse.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton...