A world without advertising
bemmu.posterous.com
bemmu.posterous.com
Basically, a world without unsolicited advertising would be one where you type "widgets" into Google and get a list of companies that make widgets. A lot of people do this even in the world with advertising.
Similarly, how do you know that Target exists down the street? Not from ads you see while reading The Atlantic... you know it exists because you can see it with your eyes.
So anyway, this argument is not very good. A world without spam and banner ads would be just fine. I'm already living in it.
I wasn't trying to argue that advertising is necessary, I was open to either opinion. I genuinely wanted to know how to approach businesses without causing annoyance, while still staying competitive.
Best answer to that I got was "write articles". Also I started considering putting an ad on some industry magazine more seriously now, since some people said that such advertising is not annoying, because people are actively looking for this information. When I remember reading magazines related to my own interests, I do recall reading the ads too and being interested in them (Wired magazine crossed the line though).
Having said that I do hate the fact that ad's seem to be following me around these days. I checked out the supplement mentioned in Tim Ferris's Four hour body book and it followed me round for ages until I cleared my cookies. Now that is irritating.
By the way I think TF's new book is pretty shabby compared to his first.
How miraculous! How spectacular! How.... utterly ordinary and common.
Most people are complaining about push advertising. I don't know anyone who says they want stores to take down their signs or websites and wants to ensure none of their friends ever talk about any products or restaurants or anything.
Once everyone is online (in some sense), and that data is made open and accessible (perhaps Semantic Web)... then advertising will still exist. But you will pay a small amount for your message to go out to the exact people that you want it to go out to, in this case, bakeries. And the message won't blanket-out to every bakery, only those that don't already have a fancy bakery business app... plus it will focus primarily on bakeries which hint at a need for such an app (based on their online postings).
Let's say you make an ad with a cat burping. It's pretty funny. Everybody laughs the first time they see it. No one will be laughing the 100th time they see it. By the 1000th time they se it, they will change the channel rather than see it again.
Now, people in other countries will hear about it, so they will seek it out because it's allegedly funny, and they haven't seen it yet.
// begin bitter
But it will be hard to find, because for some strange reason people in the US don't think that people in other countries buy products, they believe we all live in mud huts and make all our goods out of mud.
Oh, and let me say, it is a royal pain in the butt making an iMac out of clay and twigs, though wireless is really easy when you don't have any wires to start with. You should see the shiny rock I pretend is my Android phone... such a beautiful touch interface, so smooth and durable!
// end bitter
Anyway, when you do finally track down the ad, it will be on Hulu, and Hulu will block you from seeing it, because seeing the ad and then not buying the product is theft, or piracy, or something like that.
#&%#$% HULU.
// really end bitter this time
Effectively, the target becomes not that population who will not be annoyed, but the population that can be persuaded to buy with a profitably high probability. The operating point will largely be dictated by the cost of delivery and probability of conversion. Competition sort of guarantees that the former is driven lower and lower.
So far, the loophole has been that the advertisers are not charged an annoyance fee that is over and above the delivery cost. But as treelovinhippie suggests once they start getting charged, things will change.
I'd be curious to know how will this perfectly targeted advertising find its perfect targets for, say, selling V1aGra.
I distinctly remember when I saw the first billboard in Warsaw. After the first one they just started popping up everywhere, on all the streets. I remember the psychological realization that Poland was now somehow joining in some international conversation. The adverts made me feel less isolated in Poland. But also made me feel small and insignificant. Seeing adverts for the first time in a year, and the first time in my new country, was a catalyst for a psychological reevaluation of my place in the world.
This experience led me to believe that advertising disempowers while also connecting people. And its affect is psychological. Not physical but still profound.
Of course, the effects are profound.
Write about a problem your customers have, and explain how your product can solve it. Write about a subject popular with your target audience and bring your product into the story (or just stick in a promo paragraph at the end).
If you write well and have a good product, people will find you, and they will tell their friends.
I wonder if it's now possible to set up a "Free Market Information Bubble"? Have a browser add-on that removes all ads and makes the Internet operate on micropayments? It seems that there's a subset of the Internet who would be delighted to pay for such a thing.
Also, for what its worth: tech isn't the only industry with magazines, listservs, and conventions.
That's a good question.
I'd first ask what is advertising a direct response to? And what was eliminating advertising a direct response to?
For the former, I believe the first ad was placed in like the 1700s. Wait... I'll Google it... the first newspaper ad was placed in 1704 by a seller in Oyster Bay who wanted a buyer for their estate. (Thanks to AdAge for that one: http://adage.com/century/timeline/index.html)
So, I'd say that advertising is a form of getting the word out about something, when you know that someone might need it, but you're not exactly who specifically.
Then eliminating advertising would be getting rid of it because too many people were trying to get the word out, so much so that the channels for even knowing what was relevant to the receiver were saturated beyond belief.
I'd say get rid of the profit incentive, not the advertising. If there's no profit incentive for advertising, but instead direct communal bartering gain, then fewer people would advertise. The adverts you would see would be direct needs targeted to direct people who needed that stuff.
This reminds me of Craig's List. I used to love Craig's List because it was so much about community, and people sharing their needs and or looking to fill others' needs. However, when the traffic grew, the profit incentive grew, now Craig's List is over saturated. Way, way over saturated. That's why I'm now a member of Quentin's Friends. I pay $15 bucks a quarter for access to a community of people where there's minimal profit incentive driven advertising and posting, and more communal driven exchanges.
"If I had asked my customers what they wanted," Henry Ford once said, "they would have said a faster horse."
If you really think your product is in my best interest, pay me to listen to your pitch. Otherwise, place your ad on a web site containing interesting original content or get a web page and let me google you if I need your service/product.
They look for them. I realize that part of salesmanship is making people feel they need something that they did not know existed. The problem is most sales people seem to think that you need whatever they're pandering regardless of whether you actually do. So I'd rather leave the decision of whether I need something or not to myself rather than to salesmen.
Maybe what you're really asking for is not "how will they find out about them" but rather "how will I make them find out"? The answer is you won't. The internet is good enough, thank you. Maybe you'll be covered by my favourite blog or magazine, or I'll hear about you from a colleague.
But that will never happen.
The solution is you need to know some bakers, who have baker friends. In theory you'd have already developed these connections while working on your bakery software. (Seeking advice on what they'd find useful + testing of early versions)
On advertising more generally, I was once opposed to using adblock and such since it theoretically hurt the ability for sites to pay their bills. Now that intrusive user tracking has become more popular, I figure all bets are off. I think that advertising's worst enemy is itself.
Baker B: actively pulls in information about surroundings
If the product you introduce actually generates substantial value for bakers, then Baker A will be forced out of the market by Baker B. In the very unlikely event the entire market of bakers is type A, then you launch your own bakery and make a killing. In the unlikely event there are plenty of type B Bakers but none of them have started an information pull source, then you launch your own information pull source and make a killing.
Make your product easily discoverable but only with the right targeting. And avoid push-based advertising like bulk emails, SMS, cold calls.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonydemarco/sets/72157600075508...
Just came about it on Flickr a few days ago, coincidentally.
It almost already happened for used goods. If you want to buy used good you go to ebay. If you want to sell used good you adertise it on ebay.
Some products spread because they are so high quality. Google became a giant because its search was superb, Starbucks its experience great, and Facebook so life-enhancing.
But advertising is just a part of free enterprise. Such quick successes are the exception, and advertising can genuinely create awareness of value adding answers.
While certainly it can, the problem is that the vast majority of time for the vast majority of people it doesn't and is consequently wasteful and annoying. I imagine that there were a small fraction of cases in which leaches were also medically effective.
I find out about interesting stuff using the internet. Blogs, stackoverflow, HN, forums, word of mouth, etc.
Opt-in + Opt-out advertising.
Asking your friends, alpha-geeks are better.
Trusty recommendation engines where I place my interests and earn my respect by don't trying to fool me.
My answer: SEO.
A world without advertising is a world where search engine optimization rules supreme because you must be at the top whenever someone searches actively for the answer to a problem.
Of course the whole proposition becomes nil once you realize that what we call advertising is really just suboptimally placed commercial information.
We stop calling it advertising when it's relevant.