Hacker News Reader

The burden of proof is on you to establish a random wordpress blog's credibility.

The tin-foil NOAA "cover up" conspiracy the site is pushing means it's spreading conspiratorial misinformation.

False. All of the sources in the blog are cited; you obviously didn't look carefully enough before arriving at your conclusion.

Citing cherry-picked data sources, spreading conspiracy misinformation, and making misrepresentations is not credible behavior for a wordpress blog, but I can see you're of the opinion that it is.

Reading comprehension.

Source: It goes against my narrative, so it must be banned / deplatformed.

This is the new way the left "debates", unfortunately.

There are a decent amount of resources online that are skeptical about the man-made impact on the climate or whether or not CO2 is the temperature knob for the climate.