The CO2/CAGW/Climate Change alarmism Emperor has no clothes!
The CO2/CAGW/Climate Change alarmism Emperor has no clothes!
I'm simply asking you what standard of proof you would require. What would convince you?
EDIT: for anyone else wondering about the "0.04%" factoid thrown out, this article is a pretty good explanation of how the greenhouse effect works and how a trace gas can have a noticeable affect on global temperature: https://www.sciencealert.com/co2-is-only-a-tiny-part-of-our-...
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/05/01/a-story-of-co2-data-m...
In a world where you are convinced by the evidence that anthropogenic climate change is real and poses a grave threat to humanity over the next century, what does that evidence look like?
I'm not remotely qualified to read your long article and try and either debunk it or determine that yes, it does indeed have real scientific merit despite its disagreement with the overwhelming consensus by experts in the relevant fields. Nor do I particularly feel the need to. I lump anthropogenic climate change in with evolution: I don't have the expertise to evaluate the evidence myself but it seems like virtually everyone who does is on one side of the argument. That's good enough for me.
What would it take to convince you?