Now we have the new mac pro, and it's a big step up from the trashcan.
The apple trashcan certainly looks vastly better than other commercially available workstations.
Not really, when given the tendency of them to roll around when being transported in production environments, they tend to end up bolted within wooden boxes with little wheels on the bottom.
There's a reason Apple listened and put wheels on the new one.
I don't think so, seems like ALL gaming PC's are like that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SGI_Tezro#/media/File:Silicone...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SGI_Octane#/media/File:SgiOcta...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SGI_O2#/media/File:Silicon_Gra...
I'd rather see more like the SGI Indy workstation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SGI_Indy#/media/File:Silicon_G...
https://d2w9rnfcy7mm78.cloudfront.net/746965/original_3c751a...
The CPUs and multiple GPUs put out (relatively) equal heat, so they could make the single, big cooler work. But when the world went back to a single, big, hot GPU, it pushed things _just_ out of whack enough that it wasn't worthwhile to continue down that path.
It was a poor design because it didn't take into account the thermals of the hardware it was sold containing. It throttled its graphics cards from the start but also got worse as dust/age set in. It couldn't be upgraded or fixed because they chose appearance over practicality.
It was, is, and will always be the "garbage can." It has nothing to do with the industry's direction, it was poor as-sold.
https://icdn2.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/mac-pro-...
https://blog.macsales.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/prod_ap...
(which, these days is mostly true, a single socket CPU on a workstation of that grade is a poor design choice)
Not at all. Even people that love them refer to them as trashcans. It's just a cute nickname, since Apple doesn't give their machines any other distinguishable names.