Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by Causality1 | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Causality1

Assuming of course that isn't completely fabricated.

View on HN

That's a possibility.

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%83%AD%E5%88%A9

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2017-05/19/content_294108...

A case of Chinese toxic baby formula, the company contacted the father after having reached a settlement, to offer him another deal, reportedly 500k dollars, the meeting was recorded, used as evidence in extortion lawsuit against him in the company's local court. The father was jialed for 5 years before exoneration.

Some guy tried to over-settle with my dad the same way once, and he refused it, but also later found out the guy had a reputation for offering these ridiculous deals then suing for usury.

The sum is not small at the time, but it's his baby daughter poisoned along with thousands of others. After their initial settlement of around 60k, the story never ended as other cases came into public attention, so the company wanted to end it as it was at the crucial stage of going public, they can be heard at the beginning of the recording saying "Must get him", but nonetheless, the court in the city where the massive company located ruled him guilty.

> suing for usury

Is this a thing?

Are we in biblical times?

Many states have laws on maximum interest that can be charged, though at this point there are so many loopholes they basically no longer have any effect.

https://statelaws.findlaw.com/consumer-laws/details-on-state...

Obviously it's been a while, but the local business calculation I observed was, it was always better to not be sued than to be sued. And if the suit was unavoidable (e.g. guy is just nutso-litigious) it's better to have declined all business with him in the first place.

> Assuming of course that isn't completely fabricated.

The accused had a long history of stealing money from bank accounts through identity forgery. It's hardly a stretch to go from hacking a bank to steal cash to hacking football teams to blackmail them.

That's true of every crime, if the accusation is completely fabricated then any punishment is of course unjust.

But when one of the two parties is a large group with massive influence, it is more likely to happen.

Why would it be completely fabricated?

Because it's a legal accusation from an incredibly corrupt industry being leveled at someone who makes a habit of airing their dirty laundry.

Doyen in particular is extremely shady with many of the same people from the scandalous Trump SoHo deal including the man who brought a harem of underaged prostitutes on Atatark's yacht. It's amazing how small the corrupt class actually is and how bad international law enforcement is at stopping the wealthy corrupt.

https://theblacksea.eu/stories/football-leaks/the-football-l...

https://theblacksea.eu/stories/football-leaks/football-leaks...

It's fascinating how many "nationalist" leaders are privately part of a global elite class, hobnobbing with foreign interests

Maybe the reason why they are nationalist is because they see the other global elites and want to avoid them?

That makes absolutely no sense...

Why would that not make sense? They don't want to share control with elites from other countries. If they developed towards a global system then everybody would have to follow the same rules, whereas right now there are different rules, which leads to more opportunities for them to retain their power.

More likely that keeping countries isolated maintains access to tax havens, cheap labour and various other benefits.

Rewording what you wrote. Maybe a dictator can make anyone disappear instantly with no questions asked from within the country. Scrutiny from the outside will only happen if someone is fast enough to leave and open their mouth despite the threat of retaliation/persecution/execution of loved ones (a la North Korea)

I was thinking more broadly than overt dictators. Right-wing nationalists tend to have vested commercial interests that benefit from a lack of global integration. I'm thinking more of Trump, Bolsonaro, Orban, or Morawiecki. These are people that spout faux "anti-elite" rhetoric whilst having strong ties with actual global elites. This level of control might occasionally include disappearing individuals when necessary, but is much more subtle and wide-ranging.

Jean Renoir's 1937 movie The Grand Illusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Grande_Illusion treats this issue with subtlety and nuance.

Many consider it one of the greatest movies of all time.

> someone who makes a habit of airing their dirty laundry.

It was his livelihood: get some dirt, threaten to release it, demand hefty cash payments as danegeld.

It's easy to pass off the last leg of the extorsion campaign as doing public good if you conveniently leave out the long trail of demands for hefty financial gains.

And before this fact is brushed under the carpet, do keep in mind that the same suspect also demanded financial payments from media companies to access the content he was supposedly trying to release to the public.

Was there more extortion attempts besides the one he's being charged with (Doyen)?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com