He along with everyone else was critical of the first Apple Watch.
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2016/05/03/patel-apple-wat...
Seeing that he still not only gets review units every year, he gets the prime live interview every year after WWDC with top Apple executives, I don’t think he has been blacklisted.
Not to mention that Marco Arment is often critical of Apple and got a review unit of the Mac Mini last year.
https://daringfireball.net/linked/2018/10/25/night-sight
Gruber has stated repeatedly how much of an embarrassment that the MacBook keyboards have become but he famously still uses an old ADB Apple keyboard so he doesn’t have as much first hand experience as Marco who buys computers more frequently.
They have both complained about Macs falling behind compared to what Microsoft is doing with the Surface line.
Marco routinely criticizes the Apple Watch and compares it to the non smart watches he prefers. Gruber also prefers regular watches.
And of course he gets ‘paid’. If not directly by Apple in dollars, but by Apple in exposure of his name and thus his business. He does this (great) PR piece pre-launch for Apple, we all learn his name, some will want him to be their photographer of choice and thus the cycle closes.
Taints the whole point of doing reviews.
It certainly does, which is why you can never trust an early review of an Apple product. https://www.cultofmac.com/255618/how-apples-blacklist-manipu...
I can believe that Apple might do this (especially since he also cites openly breaking rules by doing things like live-streaming when it’s been explicitly forbidden) but this article doesn’t convince me it’s happening or educate me on how much of a problem it really is.
Also because the article you linked is about blacklisting.
Now that we have that out of the way, do you agree that early reviews of Apple products can only be done by reviewers that Apple considers favorable?