That is 3 years ago, is it surfacing now as a smear campaign? I am becoming very sceptical to any piece of news nowadays, and very picky of my sources of info.
Thanks for pointing that out. I read through the article and just assumed wework had announced new layoffs after the IPO was aborted.
WeWork is planning to IPO, and potential public investors deserve to know if they’re going to be betting on a company run by a crank. Exposing things like this is a basic function of responsible journalism.
Who would benefit from a smear campaign? You can’t short a private company.
Well you said it yourself, there is a betting aspect and when there's betting, tipping the scales is a possibility.
Not a smear campaign. Just Vanity Fair reporting on the highly problematic CEO of a company that is considering going public.