That is wrong. The french version stated:
> Retrait des forces armées israéliennes des territoires occupés lors du récent conflit.
In this context, "des" means "de les". It is indeed a definite article.
> Retrait des forces armées israéliennes des territoires occupés lors du récent conflit.
In this context, "des" means "de les". It is indeed a definite article.
It's clear in the context of a good-faith negotiation that Israel wasn't being given the option to withdraw from one square metre and keep the rest. But the language gives some plausible deniability to their supporters.