> While basing Windows on Linux may make some development easier, it also throws away the unique proposition that Windows provides.
Like what exactly? Do you have examples or just feel this way?
> While basing Windows on Linux may make some development easier, it also throws away the unique proposition that Windows provides.
Like what exactly? Do you have examples or just feel this way?
> Like what exactly? Do you have examples or just feel this way?
Idk, like maybe letting you actually wait for a process to exit (until Linux finally added it in recent months), IOCP, not doing stupid things like overcommitting memory... I could go on...
And then there's the documentation which is like infinitely better than Linux's...
It makes me wonder, what information drives your skepticism? It seems pretty unfounded to me.
I am 100% unexpert in systems programming. I am not challenging this sentence.
When I look through Linux's source code, I read documentation files like Documentation/x86/exception-tables.txt and filesystems/ntfs.txt. I can also read the source code and its notes - for instance kernel/cpu.c or kernel/panic.c.
Where do I find analogous documentation or source code for NT 10? Lack of systems documentation pushed me away from Windows, and I would love to learn I was wrong.
I've heard of other things but don't know enough to verify them.