Ask HN: Stallman resignation story disappeared from front page
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20990583
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20990583
Let me save everyone the trouble and condense 90% of the state of these threads now and in the future:
- Richard Stallman did nothing wrong, this is just character assassination by the feminist media complex.
- Richard Stallman did nothing wrong, this is just an attack on free software by corporate interests.
- Richard Stallman did nothing wrong, insert tedious, pedantic argument about age of consent and assault here.
- You can't prove Marvin Minsky did anything wrong either.
(...)
- Richard Stallman was actually a sexist creep who had no concept of consent and the many, many stories about his behavior towards women finally caught up with him.
- Richard Stallman did nothing wrong.
The story is worth talking about, but it doesn't deserve more coverage than it's getting here.Your meta analysis was pretty intellectually gratifying.
People can circle their wagons around RMS and attempt to delegitimize anyone who takes issue with his behavior and opinions as merely an angry mob if they want, but their right to express that issue is as valid as his.
You left out from your list the stance that while Stallman did in fact, repeatedly, do wrong, he still didn't deserve to get his words mangled by the press (which undoubtedly contributed to the public outrage).
There are a number of posts that talk about how HN ranking works, here are the few I could find:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1781013 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6799854 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9426040 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16018430
Is there a way to view hacker news in "flame war" mode?
So, that's likely why.
It's over day old and has 1665 points. HN news gradually get lower in the rank as they get older.
I wrote in such a thread and after 4 posts I couldn't post anything for over 3 hours.
This is also not the first time I've experienced that controversial topics simply disappear. Maybe you're right but it just seems like it happens too often.
It was the fsf link.
(votes - 1) / ((item_hour_age+2)^1.8)
The current ranking might have some tweaks, but there is exponential decay.It meas that using the old algorithm, the article with 1667 points and 1 day old (24-48 hours) has score between 4.5 and 1.5. Currently the last item in the front page has 242 points, 11 hours ago, so it would have 2.5 points.