Hacker News Reader

Comment by axaxs | Hacker News Reader

Right? And I didn't necessarily mean only the complaint stage. I'd consider hiring a potential sex offender, but worse and more realistically, allowing him to stay employed after such a complaint, piss poor customer service, not only to her obviously but every future rider.

View on HN

It's a little unclear what Lyft's response to the driver actually was. One article ( from heavy.com ) says that "Lyft continued to allow this driver to continue driving for Lyft under a different name", which suggests the possibility that the driver may have been suspended and re-registered under a psuedonym. The implication is that this is fine by Lyft, which is unclear. Please don't take me as being unsympathetic, I certainly am not. Here's some food for thought: If you were falsely accused of a crime of this nature, heaven forbid, your life pretty much depends on you receiving the full due process of the law granted to you by your rights as a citizen. Cases like this can take years of litigation to resolve, which is very unfortunate. This is not because the legal system does not care about women, it's because the legal system cares about the rights of the accused. Unfortunately sometimes this can mean guilty people being able to fall through the cracks, but if you can think of a better system for guaranteeing individual rights we'd all like to know. Until proven guilty you are presumed innocent. Unless remanded to custody, you are free to go about your life in the meantime. If you were fired from your job at the first hint of accusation, the ramifications for you as an individual could be very severe. In this case it sounds like the driver was guilty. However, I'd advise you and many other people to resist the urge for lynchings, kangaroo courts and witch-trials.

I replied to another comment, if you care. They should be able to tell whether or not the driver went 80 miles out of the way. That'd be a great starting point.

Another user commented on paid leave. That sounds like another fantastic option. Or something as simple as pairing the driver with only day time, male riders during the investigation period.

Should any random complaint without evidence be grounds for terminating a driver's source of income? This allows for easy abuse of the system.

Absolutely not. But they have ways to see easily whether or not she was driven 80 miles out of the way. So, if this is true, either she's telling some version of the truth, or they allow drivers and/or riders to just do whatever. If that's the case, it's on them for not having such restrictions in place. That seems like a day one level safety check.

It's important information, yes. But it is paramount to have law enforcement involved which didn't seem to happen until later. That's when they can follow up with the company to gather evidence about what took place.

If someone was accused of murder, would you be so dismissive of the allegation and so worried about abuse?

Which is why the first thing is to go to the police and have them investigate. It's not a private company's job to do this.

"This man murdered someone!"

"Thanks for letting us know! As soon as prosecutors bring and successfully convict them, we'll be sure to remove them from our platform."

Reply on news.ycombinator.com