"you frequently troll vaccine fraud related articles in support of "anti-vaxers"."
An example of you doing so:
"Most doctors get their information about medical issues by reading the marketing pamphlets from drug companies. If you actually read the relevant journal articles then you'd be significantly more knowledgeable about any given topic than the average doctor."
I don't have to make up a thing.
Of course when he was prompted to provide sources, he was unable to provide any that actually lent credence to his dubious statement. He's a purposeful troll at best.
I already gave you a perfectly good example, but I'll give you another one:
"Conclusions — Increasing promotion of CCBs has mirrored trends in physician prescribing. An association between advertising and prescribing patterns could explain why CCBs have supplanted better-substantiated therapies for hypertension."
We've been over this already.
Probably because I never said that doctors don't ever read journals, I just said that they got their information from marketing literature-- a claim which I've now backed up with 5+ sources.
Secondly, I never claimed that an uneducated person could make better decisions than doctors, my only claim was that someone following the recommendations of the academic research would on average get better treatment than they would from a doctor. And again, I've backed up this claim with multiple sources.
I, for one, entirely believe that parents should make medical decisions after educating themselves, instead of blindly heeding the advice of trained medical professionals.
I am also very, very strongly pro vaccinations.
I also refused to give my children specific vaccinations when they were very young, preferring instead to wait until their systems were more developed.
The responsibility for the health of my children belongs to me, and I take that responsibility very seriously.