Hacker News Reader

Comment by mewse | Hacker News Reader

When someone is holding up their phone or actual camera to take a photo, that’s very visible and obvious to everyone in the area what they’re doing, and social feedback can be delivered if the usage is inappropriate.

That’s very different from an accessory like glasses, which are typically on somebody’s face all the time, whether or not they’re being used for photo functionality, with a hidden camera constantly pointed at whoever they’re talking to or whatever they’re looking at. You may never know that a photo or video or other recordings of you, of your property, of your company secrets, of national security, etc are imminent or already taking place.

“What’s the real difference” is kind of absurdly obvious, yes?

View on HN

Apologize if I didn't make my idea clear enough. Seems there are two topics here: 1. being able to use a camera & 2. being able to conceal a camera.

My originally argument is focusing on point 1: people can already _use_ smartphones to take pictures and to record videos as easily/convenient as using a wearable camera.

On the point 2. I totally agree with you, wearables will make it easier to conceal the camera and that is a bad thing. I guess the takeaway here is that the camera isn't the problem, the problem is being able to conceal the camera.

I don't think being able to conceal the camera is a concern. People can do that already, the ones that do are scum and people probably already avoid them, even if they don't know they're concealing a camera, just because they're creepy in general. I think it's more about it becoming acceptable that a camera is always pointed at you in typical day-to-day interactions with people that wouldn't normally creep you out.

Do something strange in public in a large city and you'll have a bunch of cameras pointing at you in pretty short time.

The ubiquity of cameras is becoming more accepted too, I think Google Glass released now might just have made it.

I'm talking about when not doing something strange. If someone approched me with an active camera (and a microphone), until it's turned off, the only conversation we'll be having is about turning it off.

No one has ever said anything to me about carrying my phone in my shirt pocket. The lens is exposed and facing outward.

My primary recording device is 100% socially acceptable to have deployed at all times. Recording would be unacceptable, but no one can tell if I am recording. (To be clear, I am not recording.)

There is no technical difference between this and camera glasses. It is just a weird public perception problem for the glasses.

> .. phone in my shirt pocket.. Recording would be unacceptable, but no one can tell if I am recording.

People know how phones work, you press a button to start recording. AR Glasses are expected to capture at all times, recording or sending to cloud for analysis. And that is what no one would like.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com