>The problem is how to measure that skill.

Then it's a testing/measurement problem, not a meritocracy problem.

> The inclusive meritocracy in the article solves that problem by expanding the definition of skilled, and by investing in a more diverse group of individuals. This results in more (in number) skilled people at the end of the investment.

There is no problem to solve. If you don't choose the best, you choose sub-optimal personal. Also the definition of "inclusiveness" is ridiculous, as it assumes that diversity means hiring different sex or race, but not diversity of thoughts or culture.

In fact, it opposes different ideas, it's exactly the inverse of diversity. It's a thought monoculture.