[mobile] https://www.google.com/maps/@26.6249928,-80.227623,23m/data=...
-- thanks to comment below for mobile link.
[mobile] https://www.google.com/maps/@26.6249928,-80.227623,23m/data=...
-- thanks to comment below for mobile link.
On the other side of the pond, about 4 houses down... the backyard looks burned out and the pool is drained and bloodstained. This is like /r/writingprompt/
There's also construction-looking vehicles parked out front of these house so it's probably under renovation.
It's definitely a must-try VR application.
Everyone I demoed the first Vive to loved it, even though the reconstruction is far from perfect.
sightseeing (1:1)
you may be a nobody in real life but you and your clan online control the Rome Colosseum
Don't be so foolish as to think the button labelled "3D" in the content area toggles the 3D mode. Only an idiot would make that assumption!
(The above is sarcastic. I think the discoverability of this feature, and the weird 1/3/1 modality behavior of the items in the second section of the hamburger menu is shockingly poor).
Ah ah! Quite incredibly and sadly spot on.
I don't hate JavaScript, I have actually developed several web applications using it, and like it.
Google is the worst.
Aw snap! Google Earth isn't supported by your browser yet. Try this link in Chrome instead. If you don't have Chrome installed, download it here.
Or if you're feeling adventurous, you can preview a cross-browser beta of Earth built on WebAssembly.
The Chrome one seems to be much higher quality.
Is your legal team fine with that? Is there any legitimate reason anyone could possibly identify for why you would purposefully worsen the experience for a fully compliant browser like Firefox, by lowering the resolution?
What does your legal team have to say about this?