Hacker News Reader

Comment by throwaway2048 | Hacker News Reader

throwaway2048·

I think the danger of neural network bots overrunning social media with garbage is entirely valid.

It seems pretty clear to me by now that GPT-2 is not as dangerous as OpenAI thought (or claimed to think) it might be. (It may yet be as deadly as OpenAI believed it was, but we won't know until it's actually released). That's not even mentioning that it's entirely likely that it will become the first machine learning platform to win a Turing Award.

What do you think? Are you ready to get involved in the GPT-2 debate? Or do you already have your own AI platforms and don't like GPT-1? Or do you have questions and would like the community to shed light on them? Please join us in IRC at #gpt: http://gstreamer.freenode.net/?channel=gpt

Please refer to the #GPT4 thread at Wikipedia.

GPG key fingerprint: A58F D3A2 CAF7 2E0D D4A3 8CD1 C721 5FB8 2F8E 15C4

Links

I like the drift in GPT numbers across this message.

Did you really mean Turing Award?

Or do you mean "pass the turing test"?

The GP comment was generated from GPT-2.

What's the point of having a debate? GPT is proprietary IP belonging to a private company. They can release it or not as they please, regardless of whether their stated reasons are valid.

I believe that sharemywin's post is satire. It is at least, intended to appear to be gpt-generated.

Social media is already pretty full of garbage. What is the actual threat here?

The actual threat is the danger of neural network bots eventually overrunning social media with far more entertaining content.

humans already do that and even provide advertising data along with it

Reply on news.ycombinator.com