Glad this paragraph was in the article, clears up their methodology. I wonder if it applies to writing too, or if skilled writers work faster.
Glad this paragraph was in the article, clears up their methodology. I wonder if it applies to writing too, or if skilled writers work faster.
> researchers took their final step—multiplying this rate by the bit rate to find out how much information moved per second
Thank you for your explanation, worth a bag of gold!
Being "verbose" means that each letter you type communicates fewer bits of information. If the bottleneck is putting ideas together then you would expect someone writing in a more verbose language to type more letters per minute but still take a similar amount of time to communicate the idea.
In practice most Java programmers are using IDEs with good auto-completion, though, so aren't actually needing to type as many letters as you'd think.
This raises the question: if the IDE autocompletes the boilerplate for you, and also hides it, why is it needed in the first place?
The latter can trivially be used to output the former. The conclusion is obvious; some of these formats are objectively more verbose that others while having equivalent expressive power.
http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/apidocs/org/apache/xmlrpc/server...
https://github.com/zxlooong/jdk16045/blob/master/com/sun/jav...