Full Body Teleportation System
patents.google.com
patents.google.com
Profiles on the "inventor" include:
https://steemit.com/history/@scubasteve/who-is-inventor-john...
https://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=200604284330.st_clair_hyperi...
And you don't wade in. It's a hard head-first dive off the 30-footer.
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&u=%2Fn...
I see stuff like that and I'm out -- without the feeling of having missed anything.
Just wanted to say, the people of the Congo want to know who made up Belgium.
The invention is not supported by a credible utility or well established utility because the claims call for the generation of gravitational waves and the interacting of the waves with hyperspace and the effects which are asserted to come from such interactions. The existence of hyperspace is not well proven or shown to exist in accordance with credible science and physics. The use of hyperspace and gravitation waves in the claims therefore must be backed up with significant scientific experimental data to firstly prove that hyperspace interacting with gravitation waves produces some effect and secondly that the applicant has the ability to harness such interaction for a useful purpose and can demonstrate such on demand.
Also the existence of wormholes and the generating of wormholes is in question currently in the scientific community and as such these claims must be backed with proof through scientific data and description
[...]
The examiner maintains that the present invention does not conform to known scientific principles [...]
etc. etc.
edit to add the source: https://globaldossier.uspto.gov/#/details/US/10953212/A/8753... (click on "non-final rejection")
Nutjob aside, does that mean you can't patent an invention if you don't fully understand why it works?
I wouldn't be surprised if there were patents granted for things physically impossible. And on the other hand I would bet there were inventions in the course of history that defied the then-current known science.
That is to say, somebody who is up to date in the field should be able to create the invention using the knowledge from the field plus the details in the patent.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sufficiency_of_disclosure
Many lolz
"...Wanna see me do it again?"
-- Spongebob Squarepants, aka The Quickster
EDIT: This got downvoted in <1 minute, so I have to assume the Quickster was watching this thread too
Great example of why Occam's Razor is so important. The poor guy probably was day dreaming or for some reason blacked out for a few minutes, but wow. This thing is quite the read.
The application was rejected by the USPTO. And the applicant Abandoned the application. It will never become a patent.
This is a non-story. The application was filed by someone who willingly spent their money. The USPTO rejected it. And now its on the front of Hackernews.
No patent was ever granted.
* Walking through walls training system * Internet accessible mail box system * Permanent magnet propulsion system * etc...