Edit: since that other thread contains similar stuff. Can we please agree to read articles on volatile topics before commenting people?
One line of questioning focused on an officer’s accusation that Dakhil was planning to work at a gas station owned by his cousin — which Dakhil denied.
“They totally changed this scenario,” he said, rebutting several remarks and descriptions reported by the officers. “They only disclosed what they wanted to disclose,” he said. “They want to justify their decision, so they mentioned working in a gas station by themselves,” he claimed.
"[] stated that he was not sure how much he would get paid or how many hours per day he will work. [] stated that by working at one of the gas stations, this would free [] of the responsibility and allow [] to work at a different gas station."
There's a lot of detail in that statement that lends credibility over what Dakhil says.
[1] https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&object...
https://theintercept.com/2019/08/11/border-patrol-asylum-cla...
Edit: I'm aware of the fact that this isn't a US citizen, however there's no standards to define what the rules are and absolutely zero ability for accountability to the people that they are supposed to be protecting.