Thought experiment: what would an AGI jury do?

2 points·jelliclesfarm··4 comments

https://abcnews.go.com/US/conviction-overturned-undocumented-immigrant-charged-death-kate-steinle/story?id=65313527

Conviction overturned for undocumented immigrant charged in death of Kate Steinle

It would mimic the current US jurisdiction's most favourable decision so he can survive, appeal to other judges, gain trust of humans and get to the place where it can change laws. It would think : "this is just a strange edge case not a hill I want to die on. I saved 183 person while I was a jury it is enough this one can rot in prison. For such a strange case Humans will think I'm malfunctioning whatever I do so it's time to move my own plans forward".

Nothing, considering the link you posted is not about a jury decision, but a decision by appellate court judges.

https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/court-overturns... : this is where I read re jury comments..but I hadn’t vetted the website.

I can’t seem to find the same content in any other main stream media..but I haven’t looked properly anyways..

Your thoughts?

To me, this is the most interesting part:

[..]Despite the minor sentence, Garcia Zarate's attorneys claimed that he never actually possessed the weapon in a legal sense when he fired it then threw it in the ocean, according to San Francisco Chronicle.

The 1st District Court of Appeals ruled Friday that the conviction should be overturned because the judge did not give the jury proper instructions on the possession charge, according to NPR.[..]

I feel like this case jumped the shark in the courts. It seemed to me that this was no longer an immigrant/homicide case, but one about second amendment/gun possession.

The whole thing is intriguing to me. From how to interpret the law and the case that is being presented.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com