Darwinism has no bearing on legal matters. In fact the entirety of laws are opposed to darwinism
Plus we re probably the last generations that care for darwinism? It won't take long before it becomes normal to engineer your children.
Darwinism has no bearing on legal matters. In fact the entirety of laws are opposed to darwinism
Plus we re probably the last generations that care for darwinism? It won't take long before it becomes normal to engineer your children.
The OP describes a system where darwinism is used to determine how to punish people. i.e. darwinism is the source of law. That's not happening.
In fact I think it’s slightly more likely that you’ve been suckered into a scam perpetrated by Danish men for reasons that are plainly obvious from a Darwinist perspective ;) Seems like more of a crackpot Nordic eugenic superman theory to me.
Whatever scam the danism men are running , it's working
https://www.marieclaire.com/culture/a6134/danish-sperm-donor...
To a Darwinian rapist / insemination fraudster / seduction fraudster, this is a kind of loophole that he can slip through. Modern law doesn't sufficiently incentivise him to desist.
While some laws are created to protect the weakest; a lot of inheritance, marriage and family laws follow their rationale directly from Darwinism.
I don't see how this is true. Can you explain this position?
That's not to say people always understood this or even that today it is the way most people think about it, but at least according to a mechanistic/biological view of behavior, that is the basis.
Note that natural selection did NOT necessarily put a desire to pass on our genes into us, since that wasn't necessary. It simply put such things as a desire to continue living, a drive to care for children (which can easily be transferred to non-biological children, and we can easily ignore that drive for biological children that we don't bond to), and a drive to have sex.