I wanted to like PowerShell but I find the syntax choices absolutely exhausting. This looks far more comfortable to me even as someone who mostly uses Windows but also knows Unix shell.
I often wonder if people just don't like it because all they see is PowerShell scripts, where people like to spell out commands so it's clearer what they do. Imo it's a nightmare that we write bash scripts with all these 2-3 letter commands and flags that no beginner could ever understand. (but if you want to write that way even in scripts, nothing is stopping you)
You'd have to alias every command and every option to make it enjoyable for interactive use.
And of course those aliases would need to be part of the standards powershell.
Which due to the naming conventions are still too verbose.
I tried using aliases instead, but there is a danger with this - some of the aliases are commands on Linux. For example, if I use the `ls` alias it will work as expected on Windows, but if you run the script on Linux, it will run the Linux `ls` command, rather than whatever the Powershell alias is for.
There is no excuse to make a new language that re-invents nearly every basic syntactic principle or borrows from the worst examples (bash, perl).
Although the naming isn't great either; the use of namespace prefixes rather than a flat namespace of long names might have been a better (and more logical) choice. It would have even allowed for better auto-complete.