So to your comment about meeting a spouse online, or at college, etc. I don't think we're getting accurate information on outcomes.
Hm, put it this way: If someone has a hope of meeting a spouse through a particular venue, invest in it, and it doesn't work out, can we count on them report the failure? So when an analysis actually does happen, we have everything ready to see?
I don't believe so.
Aside: There's better exceptions to my original post, e.g. in US we release outcome statistics at schools.
- https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/catalog/student-outcomes.html (outcomes)
- https://studentaid.ed.gov/sa/about/data-center/student/portf... (loans)
So we even get data in some cases. But experiences in many things like dating and job searching isn't mandatory for everyone to report. And sometimes the most impactful things don't fit into Pandas tables well :)
It's a separate conversation of how important love is to individuals, but don't you think it'd be generally something a person wouldn't admit failure at in survey?
Regarding a journal of experiences and what they learned, yep, that is valuable. It can do a lot to humanize the person. If you are interested in this type of autobiographical style, Locked Up Abroad is a good docu-series. One good episode is Cullen Thomas in South Korea. He also wrote a book called Brother One Cell: An American Coming of Age in South Korea's Prisons where he has an interesting story and a lot of self-reflection.