Dell Unveils Updated XPS 13 with Intel’s 10th Gen Core CPUs and 4K Panel
anandtech.com
anandtech.com
the only downside for me, as a linux user, is the "killer" wifi. My last brush with this card was not pleasant at all, reminiscent of the mid-2000's era of "not working" and "when it does it randomly drops stuff". But I suppose the card is easily replaceable. (as, I have a precision and it's basically an XPS with ECC, a Xeon and a proper intel wifi card).
Now I have to figure out how to convince my IT dept. to buy me one. :)
I'd also completely agree that it was cheap and easy enough to replace. Lots of guides online, and getting a real intel wifi card was like $15. Took me about an hour, and most of that was gingerly opening the case.
Apparently the Killer WiFi has serious problems running on Windows.
Why is it incredibly unlikely for Dell to do the same?
Maybe I'm an outlier because I'd rather have more ports and convenience than a thin laptop. In fact, I don't like very thin devices because I feel like the thinner they get, the harder they are to repair and the easier they are to break.
They could have included one of those flip down Ethernet ports though [0][1], since I see there is plenty of space under the edges of the laptop to drop that flap.
[0] https://memestatic1.fjcdn.com/comments/I+think+hp+did+it+pre...
[1] http://bcchardware.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.Downloa...
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14194/the-killer-ax1650-a-wif...
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14426/when-ice-matters-dell-a...
Software adapted for 16:9 ration with huge side toolbars get near no usable work space (photoshop, gimp) and you don't get so much space for documents as proper 4:3 or 16:9 turned vertical
And god forbid you break the screen, nothing but the original panel will fit as all 3:2 panels are custom order
The other thing I like about it is when watching pre-hi-def TV shows, the black bars on the sides aren't really that bad, and widescreen content isn't as bad as on 4:3.
Anyway, bought the XPS because of the matte screen, excellent keyboard, and rich interfaces (for a notebook of this size) incl USB-A and SD both of which I use frequently, but these are gone on the newer model. Also not enthusiastic about USB-C as a power connector; had my Samsung smartphone connector wear out within less than a year's time. It's sad because the notebook generally worked very well for me, but with the changes Dell made ceased to stand out. Any recommendations for alternatives (maybe I should finally come around and buy a Thinkpad)?
USB-C as a power connector work great when the proprietary power supply die as you are waiting to get a replacement battery. (true story) (I have a 9360 model, which doesn't like the batteries for the 9350)
Just from having around somebody whose work function implies "a duty to extract value" in between the technical decisions, and optimising the product to death, you get products becoming worse with each generation, and not better.
See, a first reduction from ~64Wh to 62Wh might've not been even visible and been a valid "product management" decision, and not impacted the sales.
A second cut from 62 to 56 might've only deterred few power users, and could also be validated from the same standpoint, if evaluated without knowledge of the context.
But the third cut from 56 to 52 will blow up, despite the rest of the product getting the biggest year on year improvement ever.
Something suggests me that this claim is a plain marketing bs.
They always focus on the 13 in these articles, but I always get the 15, which is often a Precision.
I'm somewhat of stickler for fan noise but I hope this implementation doesn't result in being loud
>> equipped with up to 16 GB of soldered-down DRAM
That's enough for me right now but no room for expansion
>> a 52 Wh battery that can enable operation for up to 19 hours on one charge
Hope real-world battery life comes close
>> Dell’s new XPS 13 with quad-core CPUs will be available starting August 27 at $899.99
Quad-core for less than $1K...nice!
(Also, does anyone else find Dell's website incredibly confusing? Really hard to find a specific model on it---bizarre for a company that got its start with mail order.)
I ended up buying the standard edition because there was a discount that made it cost less than the developer one (!).
1) poor suspend performance (loosing ~20% battery a day)
2) Stupid pageup/down placement. I kept on hitting them when using the arrow keys.
Barring those two issues, they are great machines.
Personally, I'm much more irritated by the Home/End keys position, as they force the hand to do a long movement, when compared to keyboards that map them to Fn+side arrows (which don't require any movement).
Also not stoked about the new version having a smaller battery than the one I got, especially considering (as a sibling poster mentioned) it loses more than you'd expect while suspended.
Googling shows it has been a problem since at least the XPS 9530 (2013). I notice it intermittently on my 9570 depending on load/activity.
If they can't fix it after 5 or 6 generations, I wouldn't have much hope they will ever fix it. Apparently Dell test that the sound levels are below some limit, but that means can still hear the noise.
I fight against this craziness by mocking "wide" screens as being "short".
"The display panels feature a 1920×1200 or 3840×2400 resolution"
However 3:2 would be nice, like the Surface Laptop.