I'm not saying there aren't problems with large companies, tech or otherwise, but how exactly are they depressing wages? Who's getting screwed?
I'm not saying there aren't problems with large companies, tech or otherwise, but how exactly are they depressing wages? Who's getting screwed?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_L...
[2] https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2019/06/18/733510647/appl... which references https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/536-...
That is the scarcity mindset. Instead, engineers should be getting million+ salaries instead of the measly 150k+.
I think you mean a X/10 Engineer. A -10X engineer would have to work backwards.
While this depresses jobs more than it does wages, it makes it equally as hard for a competitor to compete on the cost of labor as suppressing wages would do. Either way, the net effect is to suppress competition.
A greater problem comes when a market dominator extends their power into other market niches controlled only by cost, like generics and foodstuffs, as Amazon especially is doing.
One solution is to disable entry of a monopolist into these downstream markets, as Warren is proposing. But a more lasting redress must somehow diminish the company's position of monopoly.
SWE's who do not get hired at all because there are so few competitive ecommerce, search, online advertising, and social networking companies.
From a politician's perspective, it may be a far more powerful vote-getter to have policies where 3X people are employed at $70K than one where X people are employed at $210K.