I read the passage you quoted carefully, and I don't see the bias. Each sentence has been the subject of media coverage for the last five years or so.
Is there a specific sentence, or word to which you object?
I read the passage you quoted carefully, and I don't see the bias. Each sentence has been the subject of media coverage for the last five years or so.
Is there a specific sentence, or word to which you object?
and, on the other side, where is the objectivity and criticism about the already present US military base? US bases are notorious for polluting the land and water with toxic and hazardous substances. there's a long history of such problems on former US military bases, even those within the US. but this article does not mention it.
It sounds like what you're looking for is long-form in-depth analysis. You're not going to get that from the news section of the BBC web site. That's not what it's for.
What you desire would be found in another part of the BBC, or a reputable magazine, or a book, or a documentary.