Comment by SolaceQuantum | Hacker News Reader

Comment by SolaceQuantum | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

However, this relies on the ability of the person issuing the treatment to provide the appropriate amount of response to the person making the problems into words. If I talked about my (hypothetical) child abuse to a psychologist and the psychologist began engaging in therapeutic techniques to normalize the abuse I would be extremely offended and likely come out worse for wear.

If I, a person of color, am having emotional difficulty processing the anxiety I feel about police persecution after being exposed to information that my race is being disproportionately persecuted, I really need a healthcare professional that (at the very least) has knowledge on when to engage in trying to direct me from my anxieties vs acknowledging that I am experiencing a normal amount of anxiety for the situation. Part of this may in fact be wanting a healthcare professional who is of my race because I have been harmed in the past by professionals who did not share my race practicing inappropriate treatments on me.

Similarly, there are plenty of female patients that ask for a female doctor, even in non-therapy medicine, because plenty of medication, illnesses, etc. show differently for women.

That's a fair point, but I'd argue that gender differences and racial differences are, well, different. There really are salient biological differences between males and females, whereas the differences between blacks and whites, while real, are purely social constructs. If you judge a prospective counselor by the color of their skin you are IMHO part of the problem.

This is not to say that you shouldn't judge a counselor by their behavior after you've started working with them. But I think it's possible for a person with black skin to be just as insensitive to the concerns of black people as someone with white skin, e.g. Clarence Thomas.

"There really are salient biological differences between males and females, whereas the differences between blacks and whites, while real, are purely social constructs."

But doesn't that mean race can potentially become extremely important when the treatment is via a form of structural socialization?

> If you judge a prospective counselor by the color of their skin you are IMHO part of the problem.

An emotional barrier that is part of the problem for which a person is seeking treatment:

(1) is not a judgement, and

(2) indisputably is part of the problem.

But, in any case, whether either or both of those are true or not doesn't change the fact that it is a real issue impacting the likely treatment outcomes that is sensitive to whether the counselor is in the group triggering the negative response or not.

> If you judge a prospective counselor by the color of their skin you are IMHO part of the problem.

There's a rather small but critical lack of nuance in your sentiment.

The idea isn't that you judge the person because of their skin color. Nobody is saying being white or black makes you a worse or better counselor or person. The idea is that you merely judge the likelihood that the person will be able to relate to you about something in your own personal life. There's nothing "problematic" about making that kind of judgment. It doesn't need to be justified or rational to anybody else. It's your personal life that you're looking for someone to open up to. Nobody else has any right to anything in your personal life, and you have every right and responsibility to make it better by your own criteria. If there's any problem here, it's the sentiment that other people have a right to dictate whom you should and shouldn't involve in your personal life.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com