Clearly (as an oppressor) I am excluded from any objective discussion of the issue.
Clearly (as an oppressor) I am excluded from any objective discussion of the issue.
I mean, your example is literally spot on. You as a parent can't be objective - you have to oppress your children to get them to adhere to your ideals of the household.
* having expectations involuntarily set on your performing of activities that you would not voluntarily perform otherwise;
* punishment for failing to meet those expectations, rather than a reward for meeting those expectations
With the contradictory idea of the person setting the expectations and punishments being "objective" in a discussion.
Certainly if the request from the children is "we don't want to clean our rooms", the only truly objective response is to either:
a) incentivize them to clean their rooms with negotiated rewards and benefits, in a true market sense b) convince them through logic and rhetoric to voluntarily choose to clean their rooms; c) agree that they don't have to clean their rooms.
The entire idea of patriarchy in civil rights is that white cis-het men believe they know what's best for everyone in society-- and this power is given to them by society through politics. That's precisely what these "social justice" movements are trying change, the power structure, and increase representation in politics and society at large. Would you argue that is it right for white cis-het men to "parent" other communities in the same way you parent your children?