On to bank support, who don't have a category for "service is being provided but refusing to cancel" sigh
Needless to say, never using a Google service again.
On to bank support, who don't have a category for "service is being provided but refusing to cancel" sigh
Needless to say, never using a Google service again.
Just say it like that. "X is stealing from this account. This is a fraudulent transaction." That frames it in a way they understand and they have a box for that.
It's also just like a former employee using passwords they are no longer authorized to use. It doesn't matter that they once had that access legitimately.
The only Google services I bother with are search, maps, youtube (in a non-logged-in viewing-only capacity, not a posting-my-own-videos capacity) and the android play store (paying for apps via gift cards). I don't trust google not to cancel new services on a metaphorical moment's notice, and I don't have any faith in reaching a human being if I have a billing problem. So I make sure not to tie my life in any way to my Google account.
It feels strange to say, as an old school Linux fanboy who vividly remembers the Halloween document release, but I tend to point "I want to move my business to the cloud" friends/acquaintances to Office 365 instead. Say what one will about Microsoft's scummy behaviour over the years, but no-one can claim they aren't into Office 365 for the long haul. And while it's not exactly easy to get a human being at Microsoft to fix a problem, it's certainly easier than Google.
CityMapper comes close but isn’t there.
FastMail support is worse than Google and has fewer features.
I've pointed out a number of errors in their FAQs, some technical and some spelling and grammar related.
They have always acknowledged the issue.
3 months later, the issues still remain. Oh well.
It really is, when first looking through a website to see if they have their stuff together.
Actually I use Fastmail, and am a big fan. I've never had an issue reaching support. Of course I've rarely had to, the service is pretty reliable.
As for features, I could flip that around on Gmail. Does Google rigidly adhere to imap/carddav/caldav standards so that standards-compliant clients have no problems whatsoever in connecting, or are there still cheerful little "quirks" when trying to use non-official clients with Gmail?