Seems like the other way around: https://www.theinformation.com/go/4146dbb37f
Since our industry has become the 1980s Wall Street of ethics, not much behavior surprises me anymore, but a successful startup allegedly backstabbing a prominent VC does.
+1
Did they have a contract that promises them stock? If yes, then they should demand that in court; if not, then they shouldn't have been "expecting" it - especially if we're talking about seasoned investors, which shouldn't be "expecting" anything other than what they themselves explicitly wrote in the investment paperwork. If they have a contract that promises them stock when pigs fly, then they shouldn't have been expecting that stock - they probably shouldn't have also accepted the disadvantageous contract, but that's a different issue.