Windows currently runs on two radically different architectures...x86/x64 and Itanium. It has for more than nine years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itanium#Architecture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP_editions#Windows_XP_...
Windows currently runs on two radically different architectures...x86/x64 and Itanium. It has for more than nine years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itanium#Architecture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP_editions#Windows_XP_...
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772344(WS.10).a...
I don't see how Microsoft will ever shed the x86 legacy in Windows. Intel would have an interest in killing off arm-based laptops with aggressive pricing, and there really isn't any history of Windows developers rebuilding apps to support other chip architectures.
Clearly the NT kernel is quite portable. There's plenty of evidence of that (MIPS, PPC, Alpha, IA-64... ). But there's no evidence that even the most modern and supposedly portable components of the desktop experience are actually at all portable. Hardly any of it has (as far as we know) actually been ported.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2010/04/02/...
Although the article indicates that support will be rolling around for a while.
And lets not forget i860 and the Intergraph Clipper.