A Professor Tried to End a Sit-In with Bolt Cutters. Now He’s Been Fired
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
And the professor's plan to enter the building is labeled a 'premeditated attack'. The six people he had with him (far outnumbered by the protesters) are labeled a 'mob'.
Oh, and the video (in which the worst thing is a punch seen from afar) starts with a scary content warning for "physical assault and violence, abusive language, swearing".
Protests have been reduced to victimhood competitions, but rarely have I seen them become this pathetic.
Chaining buildings shut is a fire hazard at the minimum, but felony trespassing + breaking & entering in reality. I understand the university officials desire to not make a scene, but not doing anything is just as bad.
I don't understand what you mean here. Do you mean that you have the right to protest, but then you can be punished for protesting? That doesn't sound right.
If I was the university - I'd start by cutting power and water to the building. They're being too nice by giving them an out by granting immunity if they leave.
If he had been successful this would have been a nearly perfect xkcd - https://xkcd.com/705/
I realize that's a little glib, but there isn't much of substance to say about something like this. If a university wants to abandon one of its buildings to students (or squatters, etc) going rouge and trying to take the building back isn't likely to end well for a university employee, regardless of the politics in play.
If I had any inclination to feel sorry for the guy, it just evaporated.
(quote comes from a Baltimore Sun version of the article since I'm hitting the NYT paywall)
"Hey guys, I'm professor so-and-so, I need to get inside to fix the computer which I use for my research."
"Oh, professor so-and-so, nice to see you. Sure, come inside and we'll unchain the door to your lab so you can get in."