Hacker News Reader

Slightly wrong. Here's the original:

"There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses."

Bjarne Stroustrup's FAQ: Did you really say that?. Retrieved on 2007-11-15.

This is spot on. In my current workplace we use Clojure, and Clojure has many of the same problems in package management as Python does (no lockfile, no easy way to create reproducible builds, no way to declare range of dependencies unless you use version pin, etc. etc.).

However, I never saw any complaints about Clojure package management in any topic about Clojure here.

Maybe because Clojure has a much smaller total number of possible dependencies? That is, "just as bad theoretically, but easier to wrangle by hand".

That's just a demonstration of the same underlying phenomenon: "nobody uses it".

We use Clojure massively enough to have multiple issues with dependencies, including the fact that sometimes we need to build a new version of a library simple to build it with more recent versions of dependency X, for example.

It is not that bad, much like I also don't think Python packaging bad. Other ecosystems have better solutions, though.

aka People complain about things they use.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com