What's described is very much like what a sysadmin was in the 90's, prior to more specialized roles.
What's described is very much like what a sysadmin was in the 90's, prior to more specialized roles.
A better name might just be modern-sysadmin or sysadmin v2.
everything in this article is what I do as a sysadmin.
part of being a sysadmin is practicing devops. not the other way around
You're totally right in that sysadmins can certainly practice (part of) devops, but anywhere I've ever gone it's less the rule then the exception and "sysadmin" is a career-limiting classification, akin to calling oneself a programmer [0]. Ends, not means, etc.
[0] - https://www.kalzumeus.com/2011/10/28/dont-call-yourself-a-pr...
I've been obscenely compensated for working on interesting projects for much of my career. then again, part of it may be due to the confidence that comes with focusing on my work instead of fluffing my title.
Today, if I had a notion to, I could probably call myself a "sysadmin" and not have trouble finding well-compensated work. But when I was freelancing, as well as when I was earlier in my career, I can tell you a lot of doors would have slammed right shut had I used the term regardless of my capacity. I do not particularly love the term "devops", but at this point its umbrella at least encompasses what we (like, you and I, not the general we) think about when we're doing this stuff, and it has a certain amount of loaned--or stolen--credibility.
As I said in a top-level comment, I'm more twitchy at this description of being a consultant than I am at the devops part.