Grubhub made websites for many restaurants, sometimes without owners’ knowledge
businessinsider.com
businessinsider.com
BUT... if GrubHub has done this (which they reportedly have, although they seem to be denying it) for businesses they haven't signed a contract with... then is that not highly illegal? There have to be laws against false representation in business, no? Whether cut-and-dried trademark infringement, or otherwise?
If that's the case, I hope they get a serious class-action suit against them with massive punitive damages. It's deeply unethical and anticompetitive, and basically smells of extortion.
https://newfoodeconomy.org/grubhub-domain-purchases-thousand...
There appears to be some clauses that offer GH some protection. However, the language doesn't really hint at what they ended up doing.
Would the following work to curtail practices like this?... Courts hit one so hard with punitive damages, and perhaps criminal investigation, that the company is wiped out. Then VCs decide it's bad business, and discourage practices like that (including by not funding someone who tries it once and expects to just serial entrepreneur if it fails), and then other companies take notice.
Emphasis added.
Further, in The New Food Economy article [1]:
> Grubhub purchased three different domains containing versions of Shivane’s restaurant’s name—in 2012, 2013, and 2014.
[1] https://newfoodeconomy.org/grubhub-domain-purchases-thousand...